Author Archives: Seth Abrutyn

Unknown's avatar

About Seth Abrutyn

Theorist. Institutional evolutionary teleological existentialist. Interested in emotions, social psychology, macro-historical social change, suicide, and why/how patterned thinking, feeling, and doing clusters in some collectives and not others.

Teaching Sociological Theory Practically

As I’ve written on the topic of teaching classical theory several times previously (here, here, and here – and spoken a bit here and here), this post is devoted to thinking about teaching theory differently. Moving forward, if you will. … Continue reading

Posted in Musings on Sociological Theory, Teaching | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

So, You Are Assigned Classical Sociological Theory in the Fall…

My best advice: RUN! Of course, this is tongue-in-cheek. This is the first of two essays I am writing on teaching theory. It’s been some time since I put words to paper on this (here, here, and here), and my … Continue reading

Posted in Musings on Sociological Theory, Teaching | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Making Sense of Affective Action, Part 1

Besides Charles Cooley and Emile Durkheim, most classical sociological theorists looked askance at emotions. The Cartesian duality that sees rationality, reason, and logic as masculine and emotion and feeling as feminine was alive and well. I’ve tackled the idea that … Continue reading

Posted in Emotion, Musings on Sociological Theory, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Why Not Affectivism?

Sociology is, at least in part, the science of social behavior. Or (just) behavior? From one angle, sociologists look at the mechanisms or forces or dynamics, depending on your persuasion, shaping, constraining, and enabling behavior. We might call this the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Sociology, Science, Suicide…and Durkheim (Part 2)

Our first step in thinking about how to teach Durkheim to undergrads and graduate students involves discussing and evaluating his descriptive model (see Part 1 for background context on this essay). Admittedly, there will be times where I have to … Continue reading

Posted in Musings on Sociological Theory, Suicide | Leave a comment

Sociology, Science, Suicide…and Durkheim (Part 1)

It has become fashionable, once again, to argue that sociology is an impossible science (perhaps it is a constant feature of sociology and not a fad at all). The logic, despite being cloaked in a wide range of new ideologically-drenched … Continue reading

Posted in Musings on Sociological Theory, Teaching | 2 Comments

The Age of Biological or Social Contamination?

For nearly three years, most of the world has been experiencing the ebb and flow of a pandemic. I’ve written previously about sociology and disease, the panic and grief social distancing caused, and, more recently, the reasons for the US’s … Continue reading

Posted in Culture, Emotion | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Cultural Sociology I: Meaning Making and the Psychological Industrial-Complex

In a previous post, I made the argument that sociology needs to go beyond just incorporating culture into a sociology of suicide. It needs a cultural theory altogether. But, what would that look like? What would be its framework? One … Continue reading

Posted in Culture, Suicide, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

A Cultural Theory of Suicide?

Sociology has famously studied suicide using Durkheim’s classic structural framework. For the uninitiated or for those needing a refresher, what that means – or at least the common interpretation of what that means – is that (a) the structure of … Continue reading

Posted in Culture, Suicide | 1 Comment

Sociology and the Good Society

As we spend summer thinking, not thinking, ruminating, not ruminating on classes, sociology, and the good society, I wanted to point to an oddity in the sociological ideology. An ideology is a set of beliefs about what we believe will … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment